Screener
PWV vs OASC
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF vs OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- PWV costs 0.14% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWV | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $78M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.6% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.41% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -37.67% | -26.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWV and OASC
Explore further