Screener
PWV vs OMFS
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFS costs 0.16% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PWV follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, PWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWV | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $275M |
| Since | 2005 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.6% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.41% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -37.67% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWV and OMFS
Explore further