Screener
PXE vs RSPG
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.21% less per year.
- RSPG is significantly larger than PXE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXE | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $134M | $624M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.5% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.20% | 21.47% |
| Max drawdown | -80.16% | -73.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXE and RSPG
Explore further