Screener
PXJ vs QBIG
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF vs Invesco Top QQQ ETF
Key differences
- QBIG costs 0.34% less per year.
- PXJ is significantly larger than QBIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PXJ follows a index tracking strategy; QBIG uses active selection.
- PXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXJ | QBIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $36M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.1% | +43.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.41% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -87.71% | -30.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXJ and QBIG
Explore further