Screener
PXJ vs KAUG
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- PXJ costs 0.16% less per year.
- PXJ is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PXJ follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- PXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXJ | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $80M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.1% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.41% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -87.71% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXJ and KAUG
Explore further