Screener
PXJ vs RSPG
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.23% less per year.
- RSPG is significantly larger than PXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXJ | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $624M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +105.0% | +52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.6% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.01% | 21.47% |
| Max drawdown | -87.71% | -73.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXJ and RSPG
Explore further