Screener
PY vs FNDF
Principal Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.10% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than PY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PY covers north america markets; FNDF covers global ex us.
- PY follows a active selection strategy; FNDF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $23.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -40.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and FNDF
Explore further