Screener
PYZ vs XLBI
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF vs State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- XLBI costs 0.25% less per year.
- PYZ is significantly larger than XLBI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PYZ is classified as equity, while XLBI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PYZ follows a index tracking strategy; XLBI uses option income.
- PYZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PYZ | XLBI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $103M | $6M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.62% | — |
| Max drawdown | -52.46% | -10.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PYZ and XLBI
Explore further