Screener
QAI vs AMAX
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- QAI costs 0.48% less per year.
- QAI is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QAI follows a multi strategy strategy; AMAX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| QAI | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $968M | $60M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.3% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.97% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -14.95% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QAI and AMAX
Explore further