Screener
QAI vs HECA
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF vs Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF
Key differences
- QAI costs 0.42% less per year.
- QAI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QAI | HECA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 1.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $968M | $378M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.95% | -11.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QAI and HECA
Explore further