Screener
QBIG vs RFV
Invesco Top QQQ ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- QBIG costs 0.06% less per year.
- RFV is significantly larger than QBIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QBIG follows a active selection strategy; RFV uses index tracking.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QBIG | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $313M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.4% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.60% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -30.33% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QBIG and RFV
Explore further