Screener
RFV vs PWV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.20% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 9.39% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -37.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and PWV
Explore further