Screener
QCLN vs ICLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.20% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than QCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QCLN covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, QCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QCLN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $739M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +118.3% | +87.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.2% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.72% | 25.93% |
| Max drawdown | -71.73% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QCLN and ICLN
Explore further