Screener
QDTE vs IMCB
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IMCB costs 0.92% less per year.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while IMCB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; IMCB uses index tracking.
- IMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -40.99% |
Similar to QDTE and IMCB
Explore further