Screener
QDTE vs IMCV
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- IMCV costs 0.90% less per year.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while IMCV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; IMCV uses index tracking.
- IMCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 1.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 11.83% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -46.33% |
Similar to QDTE and IMCV
Explore further