Screener
QDTE vs INTF
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares International Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.80% less per year.
- INTF is significantly larger than QDTE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while INTF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; INTF uses index tracking.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 14.65% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -40.39% |
Similar to QDTE and INTF
Explore further