Screener
QDTE vs IWL
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.81% less per year.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDTE and IWL
Explore further