Screener
QDTE vs IWN
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.72% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than QDTE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while IWN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +46.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 17.92% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDTE and IWN
Explore further