Screener
QEFA vs SCZ
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- QEFA costs 0.10% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than QEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QEFA covers global markets; SCZ covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, SCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QEFA | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $14.4B |
| Since | 2014 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.83% | 14.44% |
| Max drawdown | -31.71% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QEFA and SCZ
Explore further