Screener
QFHD vs DIVB
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs iShares Core Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.44% less per year.
- DIVB is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | DIVB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2026 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.34% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -36.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and DIVB
Explore further