Screener
QFHD vs HDV
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs iShares Core High Dividend ETF
Key differences
- HDV costs 0.41% less per year.
- HDV is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | HDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -37.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and HDV
Explore further