Screener
QFHD vs FVAL
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.34% less per year.
- FVAL is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and FVAL
Explore further