Screener
QFHD vs OEFA
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
Key differences
- OEFA is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OEFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | OEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $37M |
| Since | 2026 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.03% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -33.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and OEFA
Explore further