Screener
QFRD vs IDHQ
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF vs Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF
Key differences
- IDHQ costs 0.20% less per year.
- IDHQ is significantly larger than QFRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QFRD covers north america markets; IDHQ covers global.
- IDHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFRD | IDHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $741M |
| Since | 2026 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.42% |
| Max drawdown | -9.26% | -33.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFRD and IDHQ
Explore further