Screener
QFRD vs QDIV
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
Key differences
- QDIV costs 0.29% less per year.
- QDIV is significantly larger than QFRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFRD | QDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $33M |
| Since | 2026 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -9.26% | -41.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFRD and QDIV
Explore further