Screener
QGRO vs HQGO
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- QGRO costs 0.05% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QGRO follows a index enhanced strategy; HQGO uses index tracking.
- QGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QGRO | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $48M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.36% | 13.47% |
| Max drawdown | -32.56% | -20.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QGRO and HQGO
Explore further