Screener
QGRO vs IWP
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWP costs 0.06% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than QGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QGRO follows a index enhanced strategy; IWP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QGRO | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $19.6B |
| Since | 2018 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.36% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -32.56% | -38.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QGRO and IWP
Explore further