Screener
QGRO vs ROE
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Key differences
- QGRO costs 0.20% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than ROE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QGRO follows a index enhanced strategy; ROE uses active selection.
- QGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QGRO | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $239M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.2% | +37.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.40% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -32.56% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QGRO and ROE
Explore further