Screener
QGRO vs XMHQ
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- QGRO follows a index enhanced strategy; XMHQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QGRO | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $5.2B |
| Since | 2018 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.36% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -32.56% | -36.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QGRO and XMHQ
Explore further