Screener
QINT vs FDG
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- QINT costs 0.11% less per year.
- QINT covers global markets; FDG covers north america.
- QINT follows a index tracking strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QINT | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $590M | $387M |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.54% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.6% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.85% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -33.86% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QINT and FDG
Explore further