Screener
QIS vs FAAR
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- FAAR costs 0.23% less per year.
- FAAR is significantly larger than QIS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $168M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 9.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | -41.5% | +41.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.25% | 13.44% |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and FAAR
Explore further