Screener
QIS vs CTA
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- CTA costs 0.46% less per year.
- CTA is significantly larger than QIS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | -41.5% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.25% | 19.72% |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and CTA
Explore further