Screener
QIS vs MUSI
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- MUSI costs 0.83% less per year.
- MUSI is significantly larger than QIS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QIS is classified as alternative, while MUSI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $214M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 5.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -46.7% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.90% | 3.36% |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -13.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and MUSI
Explore further