Screener
QIS vs CGMS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMS costs 0.82% less per year.
- CGMS is significantly larger than QIS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QIS is classified as alternative, while CGMS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 5.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -46.7% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.90% | 3.50% |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -4.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and CGMS
Explore further