Screener
QIS vs SCUB
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCUB costs 0.91% less per year.
- QIS is classified as alternative, while SCUB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; SCUB uses active selection.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $25M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -46.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -0.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and SCUB
Explore further