Screener
QIS vs SCMC
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs Sterling Capital Multi-strategy Income Etf
Key differences
- SCMC costs 0.66% less per year.
- SCMC is significantly larger than QIS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QIS is classified as alternative, while SCMC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; SCMC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | SCMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $198M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -46.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -1.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and SCMC
Explore further