Screener
QLTA vs CLOA
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
Key differences
- QLTA costs 0.05% less per year.
- QLTA follows a index tracking strategy; CLOA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QLTA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QLTA | CLOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 5.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.21 | 2.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.44% | 0.72% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -1.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QLTA and CLOA
Explore further