Screener
QMOM vs EZMO
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF vs Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- QMOM costs 0.55% less per year.
- QMOM is significantly larger than EZMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QMOM follows a active selection strategy; EZMO uses index tracking.
- QMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QMOM | EZMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.83% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $519M | $16M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.13% | -9.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QMOM and EZMO
Explore further