Screener
QNXT vs IWL
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.05% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than QNXT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QNXT | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.66% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.97% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -22.25% | -32.71% |
Similar to QNXT and IWL
Explore further