Screener
QPX vs AMAX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- AMAX costs 0.38% less per year.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $60M |
| Since | 2020 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 10.01% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and AMAX
Explore further