Screener
QPX vs RULE
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- QPX costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $14M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and RULE
Explore further