Screener
QPX vs BEDZ
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Key differences
- BEDZ costs 0.75% less per year.
- QPX is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while BEDZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | BEDZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $2M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.28% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 20.46% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and BEDZ
Explore further