Screener
QPX vs EAOM
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- EAOM costs 1.56% less per year.
- QPX is significantly larger than EAOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | EAOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $8M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.84% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 6.50% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and EAOM
Explore further