Screener
QPX vs EAOA
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- EAOA costs 1.56% less per year.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; EAOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | EAOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $36M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 10.83% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -25.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and EAOA
Explore further