Screener
QPX vs FV
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
Key differences
- FV costs 0.85% less per year.
- FV is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while FV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; FV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | FV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 15.21% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -34.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and FV
Explore further