Screener
QPX vs FVC
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
Key differences
- FVC costs 0.87% less per year.
- FVC is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while FVC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; FVC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | FVC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $104M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 12.82% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -30.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and FVC
Explore further