Screener
QPX vs AOA
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 1.59% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than QPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2020 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and AOA
Explore further