Screener
QQH vs TUGN
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.33% less per year.
- QQH is significantly larger than TUGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QQH follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, QQH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQH | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $697M | $78M |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.9% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.79% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -41.87% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQH and TUGN
Explore further