Screener
QQH vs ZOCT
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October
Key differences
- ZOCT costs 0.19% less per year.
- QQH is significantly larger than ZOCT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QQH follows a active selection strategy; ZOCT uses structured outcome.
- QQH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQH | ZOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $697M | $115M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.79% | 2.27% |
| Max drawdown | -41.87% | -3.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQH and ZOCT
Explore further