Screener
QQQM vs RPV
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- QQQM costs 0.20% less per year.
- QQQM is significantly larger than RPV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QQQM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQQM | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82.9B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.6% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.3% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.0% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.01% | 12.77% |
| Max drawdown | -35.04% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQQM and RPV
Explore further